This page is the operational hub for the open peer review of 2DIMM.
The primary scientific record lives on Zenodo. This hub links and organizes the review process.
Your Links
Link: Read the preprint (Zenodo DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18301569)
Link: Review Framing (Zenodo)
Link: Submit Review
Call
This call opens the public open peer review process for the preprint “The Two-Dimensional Insight Maturity Model (2DIMM)”.
The purpose of the review is to conduct an epistemic examination of the model.
The subject of the critique is
- Model structure and formal architecture
- Definition of terms and their consistency
- Explicit assumptions
- Internal coherence of the model
- Distinctions from named reference frameworks
- Distinctions from reference frameworks that are recognizably addressed in the paper
- Logical comprehensibility of the argumentation
- explicitly formulated scope conditions, delimitations, and restrictions
The review is based on the published preprint and the accompanying review framing document, which explicitly defines the permissible scope of criticism.
Explicit exclusions from the review:
- Application scenarios or practical applicability
- Assumptions regarding benefits, e[ects, or success
- Decision-making logic, gate architectures, or derivations
- Monetization, licensing, or exploitation models
- Implementation strategies
- Experience reports or case studies
- Personal motivation or intention of the author
The review is public. All contributions texts will be documented unchanged.
How this review works
- Read the preprint and the framing document.
- Use the review template.
- Submit your review via the form.
- Reviews are published verbatim. We only add an ID and minimal formatting for readability.
Scope Checklist
In Scope
- Terms. Definitions. Structure.
- Formal consistency
- Assumptions
- Delimitations
- Internal coherence
Out of scope
- No evaluation of application, benefits, or impact,
- No discussion of decision logic, gate architecture, or monetization,
- No implementation, practical, or experience reports,
- No consensus or quality judgments.
Timeline
- Review opens:
17. Feb. 2026 - Review closes:
14. Apr. 2026 - Feedback collection frozen:
22. Apr. 2026 - Response-to-review published on Zenodo:
12. May 2026
Publication policy
- Default: reviews are public. Name or pseudonym.
- Optional: anonymous publication.
- If you want your name removed later. Contact us and we will update the entry.
- Submissions are published verbatim. We only add an ID and minimal formatting for readability.
Links
Contact
contact_public1 [@] 2dimm . org
Update
Issue in Review Submit form has been fixed (Feb. 28th 2026)